High Technology and Human Development

 Some basic compounds often established by leaders over a long period of time and supported by the leadership use the collective conscience of the leadership as long as they drive development at will. Improvement is usually better, but not necessarily decent. The scope of the query is as follows: "Our level of technological advancement is second to none. 

Once we reach this stage, we must prepare our society for peace, and to ensure peace, technology must Should be revised to promote coverage. Technological progress is moving in a direction that is a dangerous precedent for different societies that are a threat to their sovereignty. They are additionally driven by the war generation.

In the realm of civilization, this mode of development is not admirable, nor is it morally justified. Because it is not always morally justified, it is very socially irresponsible. An inspection of the premises will reveal that it is still final, which is a cause for concern. The final premise is the belief in the past, but in no way is it logical. What it suggests is an emotionally derived conclusion, and because of this, it fails to be regarded as the end of rationally developed ideas, at least when it is derived. was done.

A society that develops in harmony with the above assumptions - and basically according to the irrational result - has instilled in its human beings the psychology of non-negotiable superiority. At the same time, the energy of passion determines the speed of human behavior. 

Whether in optimistic engagements or in willing partnerships, the principle of equality fails to accurately paint because of the prevalence syndrome that grips the chief and the leader. And a separate society that refuses to participate in the collective sensitivities or sentiments of such a society, as predicted, by good judgment, eliminates a competent or real enemy and confronts it on all viable fronts. Falls

Most of what we know about the current world, the direction, through the media, is ruled by the most modern age. Even societies that have such an era often claim to be the best. It is not their best development that will take them to the pinnacle of power, superiority and fame. 

They can also use distance to simplify and advance information about lifestyle and nature in a particular direction, a course in which, as far as possible, an antecedent between lifestyle and nature. The relationship that was in many cases. Mystical and dangerous. This final point does not necessarily mean that technological advancement is a sign of a superior civilization.

What we want to acknowledge is that civilization and technology are not marriage. Civilized people may or may not have complex technology. Civilization is not just about technical knowledge and race or technological infrastructure, or the miracle of buildings; It has to do with the moral and mental anxieties of human beings as well as the social relations within and outside their own society. 

It is from the make-up of people's overall behavior that all styles of the physical system can be created, as well as the question of technical knowledge and technology. Thus, the kind of bridges, roads, houses, heavy machinery, etc., that we can see in a society, should, on a large scale, reflect the behavior of human beings. 

The pattern of behavior also suggests that the natural environment has been used for infrastructure sports, science and technology. Above all, the pattern of behavior wants to say a lot about the impressions and knowledge of almost different people.

I agree with the truth - and, I think, the general public agrees - that in order to increase the value of infrastructure sports and race, the environment must return to its natural state. Once evolving technology (and its supporting systems or ideas) competes with the inexperienced environment for the area, this environment, which includes trees, grasses, flowers, all kinds of animals and fish, is at its length. Decreases occur. 

Despite this, population growth, man's insatiable longing for extraordinary life, and the desire to change lifestyles without relying on the unpredictable conditions of the natural environment, beginning with the use of time. Technology no longer needs to pose an unnecessary threat to the natural environment. This is a misuse of time. 

This is a query. While a society can make the best use of technology for the betterment of life, its people must also ask: "How many generations do we want to save the herbal environment?" Assuming that society combines the mediocre use of the Y generation with the natural environment to allow you to deal with subsequent careless catastrophes, then this type of positioning point is indicated.